Home » Blog » Why Cams are Better than Porn
There have been disputes regarding the possible dangers and advantages of pornography for as long as it has existed. Typically, these arguments fall into one of two categories: either it's a public health problem that's rotting our culture and supporting misogyny, or it's a lovely expression of private imagination that helps its customers explore their sexual self. Some contend that pornography is not only immoral but also illegal. Catherine MacKinnon, an anti-porn activist, described it as "the vivid sexually explicit subjection of women." Porn is frequently used by people like MacKinnon to propagate sexist societal concerns that are detrimental to our civilization. Pornography, according to other anti-porn campaigners, is a type of sexual servitude that destroys the minds of those who consume it. It's vital to realize that this isn't limited to industry bystanders. Many former pornstars subsequently come to regret their experience in the industry and criticize their mistreatment and unequal pay.
The pro-porn side frequently claims that graphic sex representation is wonderful and freeing. They argue that pornography empowers women to own their sexuality and decide how it is portrayed, reversing the anti-feminist argument. They argue that porn may be utilized to break down harmful sexual taboos and allow people to feel at ease with their own intimate expressions. The actual explanation is that pornography can and frequently is exploitative because capitalism is exploitative. Porn is created as inexpensively as possible to increase revenues, much like the cheap t-shirts you buy from unregulated Nicaraguan workshops. This isn't to say that pornography or sex work is ethically wrong; it just means that we're allowing a hazardous industry to stay unregulated for the sake of profit.
Shira Tarrant quotes a porn agent who says one anal scene regularly makes $1200 in her 2012 study of modern pornography, "The Pornography Industry: What Everyone Needs to Know." For a double penetration scenario, the performer Stoya quotes the same amount. These are set fees that performers are given regardless of the end product's success. This implies that getting double penetrated three times a month on camera nets you $43,200 a year, according to Stoya. For dangerous and difficult employment in Southern California, the pay isn't excellent. Furthermore, the payment has no bearing on the product's success. Stoya will not receive any royalties if she does a fantastic performance and it becomes immensely popular. Her pay isn't commensurate with the quality of her labor.
Pornographers are also indebted to the agents, directors, and producers who create porn for the wider public. It's all made to be rapidly consumed and then forgotten in favor of another video. If your tastes are a little off the beaten road, or if intimacy requires a gradual build, your options are limited. Porn is about producing and consuming cheap, quick, and cruel fucking. Some argue that this cheapens sex and makes us less receptive to deeper connection. That is not accurate, in my opinion. I believe it portrays a one-dimensional, disconnected perspective of sex that, although not ethically wrong, is really dull. Consider some of your most memorable sexual encounters. Were they anything like the ones you see on TV? Some of mine have been amusing, surprising, or even humiliating. More than the acts involved, it was the person and the circumstances that made them unique. Sex may be enjoyable, thrilling, or strange. Porn is merely a little, insignificant part of it.
However, porn is intended to be eaten and then discarded. Before going down, the performers convene for 5 minutes on set. Is it any surprise that it's so boring? Is it possible to represent the thrill and intensity of real sex in such setting? Perhaps, but it is not cost effective. Perhaps it can't because excellent sex needs time and chemistry. The greatest aspects of sex aren't included in porn for some reason. This, I feel, is the reason why the pornographic business is fading. Consumers have been bombarded with the same mindless jackhammering of professional porn for years. These films have blurred together in our thoughts into one repetitive fuckfest that has managed to drain all the joy from sex. Live cameras are also popular for the same reason. They have all of the advantages of manufactured porn and even more. You get a personal connection with a live cam experience. You have the option of defining the sexual interaction's parameters. I'm often reading about how cam performers create unexpected connections with their clientele. People form strong bonds after several sessions. They get to know one another and disclose very intimate information. Good sex, it's been claimed, is a release valve for emotional strain. If that's the case, Cams offer a release that pornography can't equal. Interactivity, on the other hand, takes things a step farther. You not only command the activity, but you also get an instant answer!
Cams, unlike porn, offer each performer control over the production and marketing of their own product. While porn actresses are contractually bound to a flat ass fucking rate, sex cam hosts are allowed to charge whatever they want for their performances. They have complete control over who they broadcast to, how much they charge, and what occurs. Most importantly, their earnings are more directly proportionate to the size of the audience they can attract. They're also not risking an STD or harm by having sex with a stranger in a home in Los Angeles. Cam models have complete control of their content, branding, and promotion. They may utilize cameras to start enterprises and become self-employed. They have control over their libido, something porn supporters frequently advocate for despite the reality that this is nearly never the case in porn. Whether comparing porn versus cams from an ethical standpoint or in terms of customer value, cams come out on top. The sex cam experience eliminates the need for middlemen and directs sex work to the two people who matter: the performer and the buyer. Is it any surprise that conventional porn is on its way out?